Talk:낮추다
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Eirikr in topic RFC discussion: October 2011
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Are the example sentences given violating copyright? ---> Tooironic 20:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can't see why they would. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Copyvio is a possibility, as specific Bible editions can be copyrighted, if my understanding is correct. At any rate, the formatting is a mess (CJK languages generally should never be italicised due to severe legibility problems; the relevant words are not bolded), transitivity isn't clear, reflexivity isn't clear, nothing is linked, the usexes given don't clarify anything, etc. Looks par for the course for 123abc's work, unless I miss my guess. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 20:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how long a citation has to be before it's a possible copyright violation. Furthermore, I searched the entry to find where the page name is used in the citations, and it isn't. Why is that? Is it a conjugation issue? I can't read Korean so I can't bold the right bit. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure either about length. However, I can at least elucidate a bit about the verb -- the -다 (-da) on the end is the verb ending that changes through conjugation, but the 낮추- (natchu-?) stem should remain the same in at least a few conjugated forms. C.f. the conjugation table for 말다 (malda) ("to roll up", not sure if this is trans or intrans), where we find the stem 말- (mal-) in some forms but not all (changes due to phonemic environment). -- HTH, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 23:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how long a citation has to be before it's a possible copyright violation. Furthermore, I searched the entry to find where the page name is used in the citations, and it isn't. Why is that? Is it a conjugation issue? I can't read Korean so I can't bold the right bit. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Copyvio is a possibility, as specific Bible editions can be copyrighted, if my understanding is correct. At any rate, the formatting is a mess (CJK languages generally should never be italicised due to severe legibility problems; the relevant words are not bolded), transitivity isn't clear, reflexivity isn't clear, nothing is linked, the usexes given don't clarify anything, etc. Looks par for the course for 123abc's work, unless I miss my guess. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 20:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)