The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged by DCDuring (talk • contribs). Not idiomatic, apparently. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I was and remain unsure. It is probably idiomatic, but it seems highly encyclopedic. What I think is almost certainly idiomatic is (deprecated template usage) lapse rate. DCDuring TALK 20:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- It does seem SOPish, but I think it meets the standard of reasonable doubt, given that many meteorological texts define it explicitly: google books:"called the adiabatic lapse rate". -- Visviva 02:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, adiabatic + lapse rate, that's all that it is. --Hekaheka 14:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Kept for no consensus.--Jusjih 23:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)