Talk:crowd in on
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Sgconlaw in topic RFD discussion: November 2017–April 2018
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This doesn't seem idiomatic to me. — SGconlaw (talk) 09:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- To me neither, but see “crowd in on”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.. DCDuring (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- "crowd in on" is a known expression to me (BrE). I guess there is a question about whether there should be an entry at crowd in instead of or in addition to this one. Mihia (talk) 01:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep with the use of the lemming heuristic: “crowd in on”, in OneLook Dictionary Search. (oxforddictionaries.com, Macmillan). An alternative is to make it a redirect to crown in, an entry in Merriam-Webster[1]. Similar entries are listed in User:Dan Polansky/Phrasal verbs#Three-word phrasal verb, with links to dicts. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- This expression is familiar to me as well, as is crowd in. Though, I know it with a different definition as well, to mean people essentially invading personal space. (E.g. My aunts and uncles all crowded in on me to say hello.) I think keep--it doesn't seem to me that it can be broken down at all, as crowd in + on is somewhat incoherent (sounding as if people are crowding in atop somebody), nor crowd + in on. I wouldn't, however, support the creation of a crowd in page (my sense of the phrase as meaning "gather together, huddle up"), as per crowd (sense 2) + in. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK, passed. — SGconlaw (talk) 02:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)