Talk:design critique

RFD discussion: August–September 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

design critique

"A formal discussion of the good and bad points of a particular design". IMO "formal" is not enough to raise this above the SoP. Equinox ◑ 14:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

But it MIGHT be a translation target in some language. DCDuring (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

WP:GAME pls stay out of my RFD. Equinox ◑ 16:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Really? I can't express my uncertainty about this? DCDuring (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

The above is just an annoying post contributing nothing of substance to this discussion, and the same or similar form has now been used by the poster multiple times, unfortunately. I don't remember translation target supporters voting keep on an entry that has no actual translation. If someone wants to use the translation target/translation hub rationale, they have to do their homework and show what the interesting translations are. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 05:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
• RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 04:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)