RFV discussion: July–August 2019

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


This does not look like an English adjective! Perhaps it's a quite bad misspelling for dioecious. Equinox 05:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Or for dioicous. — Eru·tuon 07:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Is the latter really an Alternative form of dioecious? I thought the two have different meanings.  --Lambiam 11:33, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 20:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply