Talk:ill-

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Leasnam in topic RFD discussion: English prefix

RFD discussion: English prefix edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Not a prefix; cf. (deprecated template usage) well-. ※ Raifʻhār Doremítzwr   〰 ··  〰  01:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Not a prefix but an adverb. The hyphen is purely grammatical, as in "a badly-made chair". Equinox 18:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFD-failed.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 10:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I see. I was not aware it had been previously reviewed. Also, I thought that the sense of 'bad' as in "ill-will", etc. might qualify it as a combining form/proto-prefix (if there is such a thing) since it is somewhat opaque and it seems likely that it could eventually evolve that way. Leasnam 21:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
It also assists when one is attempting to categorise and view all words containing ill-. I think that was my primary impetus in creating the entry, if I recall correctly. Leasnam 13:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFC discussion: May 2009–March 2010 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Is this all right? --Duncan 12:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sure, except for not being a prefix. And there are not very many adjectives, nouns, or adverbs that don't appear with hyphens before and/or after. We could soon break 2MM entries by including similar terms. See head and -head for an interesting case of not including a combining form. DCDuring TALK 14:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The entry has been deleted.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 10:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


Return to "ill-" page.