Talk:kâğıt

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFM discussion: January–May 2017

RFM discussion: January–May 2017 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I have no idea if leaving out the circumflex is a valid alternative spelling or a mistake. Crom daba (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some discussion at Talk:kağıt suggests it may be a valid spelling even though the pronunciation is that of kâğıt. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Use of this spelling seems anomalously high for a misspelling, and native speakers have not labelled it thus. Our choice of which to lemmatise is supported by Turkish Wikipedia and BGC. I think that this is therefore resolved as is. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "kâğıt" page.