Talk:polyromanticism
Latest comment: 9 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: February–July 2015
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
The single Google Books match is an obvious nonce (in quotation marks) and is not even the given sense! Equinox ◑ 16:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, User:kc_kennylau has been re-adding rubbish like "heteroromanticness" and "sapioromanticness" in blatant contradiction of WT:CFI. I blocked him for a day so he can actually read the rules. Equinox ◑ 02:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Couldn't cite. Also couldn't cite polyromantic. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 07:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)