Talk:servable
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: preservable OED suggests there's nothing Skisckis (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
RFV-failed. Obviously very difficult to search for, but given that (a) OED has not a single cite, (b) Cockeram was known for entering Anglicised Latin words into his dictionary without evidence of actual use in English, (c) the sense is semantically not in alignment with the way we use the verb serve in English, and (d) there are no results in EEBO, I am satisfied to fail this. This, that and the other (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)