Talk:sweet on

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Per utramque cavernam

@Equinox: Hello. Does this (and sweet upon) merit a separate entry? We already have the relevant sense at sweet, and I think we should treat transitive/valent adjectives the same way we treat prepositionally transitive verbs, i.e. without including the preposition in the entry title. --Per utramque cavernam 13:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's what I did with big of recently (after Kiwima suggested it to me). --Per utramque cavernam 13:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I think we should delete sweet on/upon and merge it all into sweet, but can't be bothered to raise a discussion; feel free. Equinox 13:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Equinox: All right, I'll do that later on the BP. --Per utramque cavernam 13:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Return to "sweet on" page.