Template talk:art
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic RFM discussion: June–July 2011
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is currently a redirect to {{arts}}
, which is a context template. But it conflicts with {{etyl:art}}
, the family template for constructed languages. —CodeCat 22:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see how there's a conflict. The only template that should be using
{{etyl:art}}
is{{etyl}}
(and some templates closely related to it, like{{etyl-usage}}
and perhaps{{dervcatboiler}}
);{{art}}
is not going to cause any problems for it, because the whole point of{{etyl:art}}
is to supersede{{art}}
in that case. —RuakhTALK 15:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)- I have the same initial reaction as Ruakh. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)