Template talk:second-person singular of
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This template is used only for English. It is not very specific, because it doesn't allow for things like tense, mood and voice to be specified. This makes it unsuited for most other languages, because only in English is the second-person singular form "special" enough to warrant its own template. Compare it to {{en-past of}} and {{en-simple past of}}, which were also used only by English and moved a while ago. I think we should include "archaic" in the name as well. We already have {{en-archaic third-person singular of}} so this would match that. —CodeCat 22:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support as it reflects how the templates are actually used. Are is a special case in that it's a distinct second-person form but not archaic. Non-English words can use
{{conjugation of}}. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Moved, orphaned and deleted. Keφr 15:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)