Hebrew roots.

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua

Sorry; I have had an artery operation in hospital, so have not got round to replying as I OUGHT to have done earlier. So, thank you for your encouraging message, I received that information content from a Christian friend who had completed a degree course in ancient languages and bases his findings upon recorded facts rather than the obscurities of science. You would not be blocked unless by posting vandalistic or false information on the entry pages or by abusive remarks on talk pages. If you do consider any additions to the etymology section, please adhere to the stringent guide lines posted on (my) user page and avoid deleting any part of what is already there (vandalism). I put (my) for my contributions on a user or talk page, because as soon as any such material is saved and published in any Wikimedia site it becomes the property of Wikimedia as well as that in the main entry section - in this case - Wiktionary, which is a branch of Wikimedia, as you would already know. Andrew

Andrew H. Gray08:00, 5 April 2018

I feel moved to respond, and note that facts are data points, and the scientific method is one framework for attempting to interpret those facts. Scientific work must be published to have any weight in the broader community, and in publishing, it is made available for others to inspect, question, verify, and attempt to reproduce. Any scientific work that cannot be reproduced is thereby discredited. Nothing obscure about it. It might be complex, and it might need a lot of studying and reading to understand, but it's not obscure (i.e. hidden).

‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig16:42, 5 April 2018

What you present is absolutely true. My main concern is over false links and atrocities such as the accidental source error huff on the dandruff entry, thereby misleading viewers; and, of course, the older the etymology the more the conjecture normally; that is why I prefer to employ a points system. If the simple guidelines are adhered to with all main etymology edits any confusion on the part of the reader should be obviated. I am not free to pioneer P.I.E. roots on such pages, but leave it to those graduates whom you specified. Andrew talk

Andrew H. Gray06:48, 6 April 2018