This is getting ridiculous.

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua

RfV is for when there are doubts over whether the term exists. And I have doubts.

CodeCat16:41, 11 October 2016

And why is your opinion superior to others? UtherPendrogn (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

UtherPendrogn (talk)17:50, 12 October 2016
 

And why is your opinion superior to others? UtherPendrogn (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

UtherPendrogn (talk)17:50, 12 October 2016
 

And why is your opinion superior to others? UtherPendrogn (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

UtherPendrogn (talk)17:50, 12 October 2016
 

And you didn't just rfv, you also deleted my correct meaning of the name, then edited again to stop me from adding it back.

UtherPendrogn (talk)18:04, 12 October 2016
 

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Moderatus#Latin

This is one of the best edits I've seen. I hadn't included some information (since I didn't know of it), which JohnC5 and Semperblotto filled in. You just seem to change inconsequential things. Why do you go around nitpicking on my edits? A lot of it is unwarranted too. If I put "cel-noun" you change it to "head|cel-noun", while if I put "head|cel-noun" you change it to "cel-noun".

UtherPendrogn (talk)18:26, 12 October 2016