Christian58
Joined 23 March 2012
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Equinox in topic Tories
I see there's a real book citation there now, instead of a made-up usage example. Equinox ◑ 23:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if there is a book citation, Wiktionary is not supposed to be a political soapbox. My statement was fair, balanced and politically neutral. I am referring this to the Admins for further clarity. Christian58 (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- I am an admin, and I think the citation is fine: it shows usage of the word. If you want to find another book citation that is pro-Tory, do so. Equinox ◑ 23:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just because it has a citation doesn't mean it is right. Wiktionary is not supposed to be political, this is just someone having a dig at the Conservatives. Why are you so against my fair and neutral statement? I am referring this for an independent opinion. Christian58 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- We are in the business of documenting words, and proving that they have been used. The nature of the usage isn't important. Otherwise we would have to delete words like nigger in case somebody got offended. See WT:CFI. Equinox ◑ 23:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just because it has a citation doesn't mean it is right. Wiktionary is not supposed to be political, this is just someone having a dig at the Conservatives. Why are you so against my fair and neutral statement? I am referring this for an independent opinion. Christian58 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- I am an admin, and I think the citation is fine: it shows usage of the word. If you want to find another book citation that is pro-Tory, do so. Equinox ◑ 23:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if there is a book citation, Wiktionary is not supposed to be a political soapbox. My statement was fair, balanced and politically neutral. I am referring this to the Admins for further clarity. Christian58 (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)