Wiktionary:Votes/2010-10/Deleting Wikisaurus slash-more pages

Deleting Wikisaurus slash-more pagesEdit

SupportEdit

  1.   Support Dan Polansky 06:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  2.   Support SemperBlotto 07:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  3.   Support Mglovesfun (talk) 08:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  4.   Supportlexicógrafo | háblame — 14:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
  5.   SupportInternoob (DiscCont) 03:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  6.   Support DAVilla 09:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  7.   Support. Yeah, get rid of all of these. Relegating them to such a page diminishes the incentive for users who really want to include such terms from going out and finding actual CFI-worthy citations (or from discovering that there are none). bd2412 T 18:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  8.   Support Daniel. 19:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  9.   Support – verifiable content can be included in main space/Wikisaurus, while unverifiable content can go to other websites, such as Urban Dictionary. Slang/sexual pages attract more attention and require more tending, but fit into our existing process. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
  10.   Support [The]DaveRoss 22:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC) I am always a fan of making WikiSaurus suck less.

OpposeEdit

AbstainEdit

DecisionEdit

  • Passes with 10-0-0, 100% support. Execution pending. --Dan Polansky 11:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)