Open main menu

Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2007-08/User:SemperBlotto for bureaucrat

Contents

User:SemperBlotto for bureaucratEdit

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:SemperBlotto as a local English Wiktionary Bureaucrat. To the extent that "bureaucrat" is a title of respect, few contributors are so clearly deserving. My selfish intention in this nomination, however, is simply to have a bureaucrat that's always available. DAVilla 12:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 17 September 2007 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 17 August
  • Acceptance:
    • OK. This time I have read the small print, both here and on Meta, and have no objections. I cannot guarantee to be "always available" but I do logon several times on most days. SemperBlotto 13:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

SupportEdit

  1.   Support Robert Ullmann 13:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  2.   Support DAVilla 13:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  3.   Support Versageek 13:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  4.   Support Jeffqyzt 13:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC) ...BTW, didn't User:Vildricianus resign as 'crat? Should there be resigned/inactive sections of that page (as per w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats)
  5.   Support —Stephen 14:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  6.   Support Yes please. Widsith 14:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  7.   Support Thryduulf 14:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  8.   Support Rod (A. Smith) 16:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  9.   SupportRuakhTALK 16:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  10.   Support Connel MacKenzie 16:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  11.   Support \Mike 17:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  12.   Support Tohru 01:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  13.   Support ArielGlenn 03:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  14.   Support EncycloPetey 00:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  15.   Support. bd2412 T 02:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  16.   SupportSaltmarsh 06:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  17.   Support Williamsayers79 17:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  18.   Support As per nom. Neskaya talk 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  19.   Support Medellia 15:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  20.   Support Dmcdevit·t 07:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  21.   Support H. (talk) 14:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC) definitely.
  22.   Support Cynewulf 22:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  23.   Support I like this person and see potential. Thecurran 06:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

AbstainEdit

DecisionEdit

  • Does this vote need +25 or is this enough? DAVilla 19:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
    Judging by the other votes at Wiktionary:Bureaucrats, this is plenty. We just need to wait for one of the existing bureaucrats to notice this and take care of it. :-) —RuakhTALK 19:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
    Do bureaucrats have the ability to appoint other bureaucrats? DAVilla 19:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
    Yes. At least, they certainly used to be able to, and the documentation still says that they can. —RuakhTALK 22:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
    The only time "minimum 25" comes into play, is when meta: rules override local policy - such as for CheckUser votes. --Connel MacKenzie 19:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Stating the obvious here. Passes 23-0-0. DAVilla 19:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Appointed --Dvortygirl 04:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)