"FitBot"? (starts quivering) ... "must sit on floor!" (gasps for air) ... (restores roflcopter, complete with ASCII art) ... (regresses:) "mommy mommy, I found a BOT! can I keep it" "Um, What's its name?" "MtbfBot!" "Okay, only if you feed it." (Ahem. resumes chair) Robert Ullmann15:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, bringing the ASCII art back would be good, the commons people said I couldn't upload it because I didn't have permission from the original author... Conrad.Irwin22:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's hard to settle discussions that don't happen. I've already held off more than three years on creating entries for inflected Latin forms, and in that time no serious discussion was ever carried through to conclusion. I'd rather not wait another three years only to find there is still no concensus. Each language has its own peculiar system of doing things; Spanish, Italian, Finnish, Latin, English are all different. I use {{conjugation of}} because of its versatility and because it is potentially possible for users to customize display if we limit our templates. I have been using it for more than two years now, with no concerns from anyone other than the issues of capitalization and punctuation. The page you mention was a DAVilla initiative that died quietly. --EncycloPetey20:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]