Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams

User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams

• Nomination: I hereby request permission for User:Conrad.Bot to:

  Create templates containing anagrams (such as Template:anagrams:en/aabdor) and include them on pages just before the first category link ( abroad)

  The robot can be manually overridden using the simple protocol of {{include anagrams}} and {{exclude anagrams}} - the presence of which in the master template will cause it to include or exclude every parameter of each from the process.

  While initially it will only add the anagrams for English, I expect that, as with the indices, it will include other languages as the specific details behind what they count as an anagram are revealed.

  Conrad.Irwin 22:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

• Vote ends: 23:59 20 September 2009 (UTC)
• Vote started: 22:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

• Discussion:

  Wiktionary:Beer_parlour_archive/2009/August#Wiktionary:Anagrams

  Wiktionary talk:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams (this vote's talkpage)

Support

1. Support EncycloPetey 22:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
3. Support I'd also like them horizontal, but that a separate decision as Cirwin made it all customizable. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 23:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
4. support this will save us lots of tedious work which a bot can do in a much better fashion. -- Prince Kassad 17:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
5. Support, for reasons already stated above. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
6. Support Why not? :) 50 Xylophone Players talk 22:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
7. Support Manual work saved is a good thing. (Pretty soon, we're not gonna need editors anymore 'cuz people came up with bots for every task imaginable :) L☺g☺maniac chat? 16:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
8. Support and hope to see more bots doing fully automatizable tasks such as creating categories like Category:hy:Anatomy or adding lang=hy parameter to context tags such as {{colloquial}} when I forget. --Vahagn Petrosyan 09:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
9. Support —Ruakh_TALK 14:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose EncycloPetey 22:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC) I don't oppose the idea of anagrams or their inclusion as a section, but they should be listed after the Translations section, ahead of See also, External links, and References (or possibly after the See also). --EncycloPetey 22:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

   Ok, I was going by the list in WT:ELE which puts them right at the end. Conrad.Irwin 22:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

   The list there doesn't include them. --EncycloPetey 22:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Oh, I see; it's a level 3 header. --EncycloPetey 22:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Decision

• Passes 6–0.​—msh210℠ 19:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I missed this one. Belated support! I had wished for an anabot for a while. Equinox ◑ 22:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)