Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-06/User:Whymbot for bot status

User:Whymbot for bot status edit

  • Nomination: I (User:Whym) would like to run an interwiki bot under the account Whymbot (talkcontribsrights), and would like to ask for approval. It is a bot based on interwiki.py. My plan is that, instead of working on all pages, it will focus onto pages that have no interwiki links yet. I believe such pages warrant more attention, and that a bot dedicated to them will nicely complement the other interwiki bots. Edits to be performed look like these: [1][2][3]. Notice the lack of interwiki links in the previous versions of the pages. The bot's latest source code is available for your review. Whym (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vote starts: 10:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Support edit

  1.   Support Trusted user and experienced bot operator. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support, because somehow our existing interwiki bots seem to be unable to keep up with the work. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support, but why is there suddenly an influx of interwiki bots? --WikiTiki89 18:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I dunno, but it's something I can't complain about. We really need them, considering how fast new pages can be created across all of the Wiktionary variants. -Xbony2 (talk) 23:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support -Xbony2 (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Strong support — I.S.M.E.T.A. 13:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

Decision edit

6-0-0 Passes --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephen G. Brown --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. —Stephen (Talk) 02:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]