Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Jackofclubs as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. They've been here nearly a year now, have a solid list of new entries to their credit, and a predilection for patrolling, category maintenance, and all that other boring administration stuff (which is made much easier and more effective by admin status). Not incredibly chatty, but the few conversations seem to demonstrate responsiveness. Besides that, I stand by my position that a good admin doesn't necessarily have to be a big talker. -Atelaesλάλει ἐμοί22:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Notwithstanding a few contributions I highly disapproved of in the past, I have a feeling that the candidate will soon learn to be a pretty good admin. --Duncan19:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nothing I can put my finger on, but I get bad vibes from the nominee's contributions list. (Not vibes of malice, just of inexperience or something.)—msh210℠17:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AbstainDAVilla06:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC) This vote comes after the close, but I figured I may as well make it explicit. Nominations for admins are best when one is surprised to learn that the user has not already been granted those privileges. I have neither the heart to oppose nor the confidence to support, but that choice aside, I do welcome all who make this project their own.[reply]
Really? I think your comments were spot-on: those are exactly the vibes that WF gives. I don't think he's malicious at all, just maybe missing a few parts. —RuakhTALK02:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]