Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-03/User:PseudoSkull for admin

User:PseudoSkull for admin edit

Nomination: I hereby nominate PseudoSkull (talkcontribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Ol' Skullface has been around a long time (under some other names before this; but no stalking because we were all newbies once) and is clearly dedicated to this project, having created a lot of good entries and contributed to RFV/D discussions. He set up the Discord chat server and regularly reverts vandalism, which would be easier if he had the tools.

Schedule:

Acceptance:

  • Languages: en, da-2, es-2, fr-1, pt-1, ca-1
  • Timezone: UTC-5:00
I accept this nomination. PseudoSkull (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit

  1.   Support Equinox 05:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Conscientious, effective, and would make good use of the admin tools. -Stelio (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   SupportUngoliant (falai) 11:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support, though I wish she flirted a bit less with (what appears to me as) fringe content. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 12:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC) P.S. I thought she was already an admin, otherwise I'd've called my buddy Rerum scriptor to nominate her.[reply]
    Fortunately we can rely on Equinox's judgment instead. DonnanZ (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    In my view fringe content is what sets WT apart from other dictionaries, so I fully endorse it.__Gamren (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   SupportVorziblix (talk · contribs) 16:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   SupportΜετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 17:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support, has the makings of an awesome admininstrator. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support — (((Romanophile))) (contributions) 20:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support -Xbony2 (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 02:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support on the condition that the editor will lose admin flag if, in future, someone creates a vote for the editor to keep the admin flag and the vote does not achieve consensus; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I hate to start this debate again, but unless this stipulation is approved by a majority of the voters, Dan's vote must be counted as oppose. —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 12:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    If you wish to discuss this, I have created Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2018-03/User:PseudoSkull for admin#DP condition. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   SupportAryamanA (मुझसे बात करेंयोगदान) 11:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 12:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 02:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support - DonnanZ (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Wyang (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 10:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

Decision edit

  • Passes 18–0–0 (   ) or 17–1–0 (   ). Could a bureaucrat please update PseudoSkull's user rights? —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 00:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]