Talk:共產黨

Image

中国何以强
缘有共产党

@Geographyinitiative The image File:中国何以强 缘有共产党 IMG 20141009 170747.jpg is removed because it does not show the entity described by the word itself, but rather a mere usage example of the word. 恨国党非蠢即坏 (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Referring to this removal, I meant to count this photograph as a real-life example "usage" of the word that would bring the reader a view of this word's usage in daily life. However, if it is not acceptable for some reason, I understand. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Seeing that the community is seemingly not in favor of my edits here or on 中共 and considering that the topic may be a little politically sensitive given the nature of the Beijing regime, I will not continue to dispute on this at this time. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Dungan

@Fish bowl: Re: diff, I don't have access to "林濤 2003", can you link, please, if it's available?

краткий дунганско-русский словарь (kratkij dungansko-russkij slovarʹ) has an entry ГУНЦАНДОН I-II-II компартия. (page 54 per original)

If I change the input to |dg=гун1цан1дон2, the result will be "/kuŋ²⁴ t͡sʰæ̃²⁴ tɑŋ⁵¹/" per your dictionary. I am not familiar with Dungan tone sandhi. Should we have both or do you think one of the sources is wrong? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Atitarev: You can find copies of 林涛's books on Dungan at L!bgen. I am very much not an expert who can say that one source is better than the other, so I would prefer having both as the safer option. —Fish bowl (talk) 07:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

FWIW, chapter 4, listing individual characters: 共（гун，去聲）、產（цан，上聲）、黨（дон，上聲）→3(?)-2-2. —Fish bowl (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)