Talk:𐤉𐤄𐤅

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFV discussion: March–April 2021

RFV discussion: March–April 2021

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


By @Inqvisitor. I'm a little confused by this, but I would like to know what manuscript has the trigrammaton in Paleo-Hebrew script in running Aramaic. For this form, {{R:CAL}} offers Egyptian Imperial Aramaic, Syriac, and Mandaic, none of which would normally use Paleo-Hebrew. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 09:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I found a book (of unclear reliability) by Gerard Gertoux, "The Name of God Y.eH.oW.aH" (2015), which has drawings of some coins with this spelling in Paleo-Hebrew (but apparently they are taken to be in the Hebrew language, not Aramaic), and which mentions that a trigrammaton spelling was used in Aramaic in Elephantine papyri (but seemingly not in this script?). I.e., I've got nothing. - -sche (discuss) 02:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply