Talk:AACFO
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFV discussion: August 2016–May 2017
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
As was noted in Feedback, there doesn't seem to be any evidence for this outside of dictionaries. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I found some mentions of the AACFO in local newspapers:
- 1979: https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/149456503
- 2002: https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=z3giAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Aa0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=6134%2C521617
- According to the 2002 source they were founded in 1978. Unfortunately local papers tend not to research their stories very well, and in any case it's impossible to determine whether they actually still existed in 2002. I suspect this organisation, if it existed in a meaningful way, was a bit of a one day fly.
- I doubt this is enough attestation though, and I haven't found even a single mention of the abbreviation AACFO used for this association. — This unsigned comment was added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) at 9:59, 28 August 2016.
- RFV failed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)