Talk:caduc

@Chignon Is the term e caduc best treated as a separate entry or should caduc have a sense like "reduced"? ←₰-→ Lingo ^Bingo _Dingo (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

• It has its own entry on the French Wiktionary - go for it. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Lingo Bingo Dingo I think it deserves its own entry, yes. But @SemperBlotto, what you're saying shouldn't be made into a rule: fr.wikt has entries for plenty of things that we don't want. Chignon – Пучок 11:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)