Talk:cis privilege

Latest comment: 4 years ago by -sche in topic RFD discussion: April 2020

RFD discussion: April 2020

edit
 

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The term is classic example of sum-of-parts term. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, we do have white privilege. —Suzukaze-c 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I want to close this as the proposer since its covered under the coalmine clause of the CFI. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 23:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Withdrawn by the nominator / passes COALMINE, so kept... (although, were it not for that, I would indeed say to delete it as SOP, and probably white privilege, too.) - -sche (discuss) 01:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Return to "cis privilege" page.