Talk:creepshotter

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: March–June 2019

RFV discussion: March–June 2019

edit
 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


DTLHS (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

In addition to the cite in the entry: "49-year-old creepshotter", "rulings in favor of creepshotters", "would-be creepshotters" (page 105). No idea whether they are all durable — Bustle probably isn't. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 12:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Apart from the cite from Elle (assuming that the magazine in the video was actually printed) they don't look durably archived. I'd think usenet would be a good source. DCDuring (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the Elle cite looks good (Issuu digitizes magazines so we can find them, while libraries archive copies of them so they're "durable"). For the IBT we would need to see if it appeared in print. As an aside, I wonder if creepshooter is ever used in this sense. - -sche (discuss) 00:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to "creepshotter" page.