Talk:equivalent-teeth shrew mole
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
This common name was evidently coined by the Chinese authors of the original 2013 description of the species, and was used as the title of the Wikipedia page. Everything else I can find on Google seems to be repackaged Wikipedia. This is an insignificant, geographically remote cryptic species that required DNA analysis to distinguish from its sister species, and the name is awkwardly sesquipedalian. As a consequence, I have my doubts as to whether this name has caught on, or ever will catch on in actual usage (as opposed to regurgitation of someone else's free content). Chuck Entz (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- One cite on citations page. I think this should become a
{{no entry}}. This, that and the other (talk) 03:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)