Talk:nature preserve
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: April–August 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
nature reserve
edit
- Keep. It is a widely used term and something people may want to look up - see also the discussion below. John Cross (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)****
natural preserve
edit
natural reserve
edit
wildlife reserve
edit
wildlife sanctuary
edit
Correct me if I'm wrong. I believe these are all SOP. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- They appear to be SoP, but they are all synonyms or semi-synonyms. I would say keep. Cambridge has nature reserve at least. DonnanZ (talk) 07:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. They don't feel like they're entirely SOP. I'm not sure they can really be fully understood by their constituent parts. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- But preserve for one has the sense "A reservation, a nature preserve." If this word alone means that, doesn't it follow that at least nature preserve and natural preserve are SOP? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not if it passes the in a jiffy test. If it doesn't, however, then I'm inclined to agree. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- But preserve for one has the sense "A reservation, a nature preserve." If this word alone means that, doesn't it follow that at least nature preserve and natural preserve are SOP? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have never heard of "nature preserve". I think it is AmE. I would have taken it as an error for "nature reserve". On that basis I vote keep, at least for that one. Mihia (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- M-W says it is AmE [1]; I have added a label. Mihia (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Natural preserve also proved to be AmE when I googled it. DonnanZ (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- M-W says it is AmE [1]; I have added a label. Mihia (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Would the good old "translation target" -justification fit here? --Hekaheka (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- I would say so, yes. DonnanZ (talk) 17:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep all: per Andrew Purplebackpack89 15:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept per above consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)