Talk:oilam
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV
Isn't this probably an inflected form? Latin and PIE suggest that this could be accusative singular of oila (which also appears in the inscription). --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 17:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- It’s accusative. Oila, in that inscription, is accusative plural. — Ungoliant (Falai) 18:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Is the nominative form known? And can what's known of the declension be put here (or at least, can this be marked as acc. sing.)? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don’t know if the nominative is known. It can be marked I guess, but since the entire Lusitanian corpus is 5 short rock carvings we haven’t the luxury of picking lemmas. — Ungoliant (Falai) 15:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Is the nominative form known? And can what's known of the declension be put here (or at least, can this be marked as acc. sing.)? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)