Talk:praedandus
Latest comment: 8 years ago by -sche in topic RFC discussion: August 2014–January 2016
The syntax is not correct. — This unsigned comment was added by SxDx (talk • contribs).
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
What is this an alternative form of? DTLHS (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have my doubts that this is an alternative form of anything. Here is the context of the edit that created it. The sequence went: praeclarissime,praedaturus, praedandus, praedaturum, praedatura. The previous creation, praedaturus, also has a questionable alternative form section, and there were other errors nearby such as this: diff. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not an alt form so much as an inflected form of an alt form, which tripped up the bot. See also User_talk:SemperBlottoBot#abominandus. - -sche (discuss) 04:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- This entry was fixed by an IP in December 2014, who defined it as "plundering; raiding". @I'm so meta even this acronym, JohnC5, could you sort out extergens and extergendus? Also, praedaturus defines itself as an alt form of praeurus, is that right? (praeurus is a redlink.) PS, I had cleaned up abominandus to say "which is to be deprecated or abhorred" and frendendus to "which is to be ground"; are those definitions accurate? - -sche (discuss) 03:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, John. :) - -sche (discuss) 04:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)