Talk:technosexual

Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFV

RFV

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Tagged but not currently listed; it was archived without being resolved. Previous discussion here. From the List of Oldest Tagged RFVs. Some senses already have some citations. - -sche (discuss) 07:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well, times have changed since that discussion. It looks fine to me. Can we remove the tag now? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nah, that's what happened last time (the tag was removed without the senses having been cited). It actually needs to be cited this time around. I'll see if I can cite it. - -sche (discuss) 21:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The part of the first definition that says "defines himself" seems a little odd. Also, the second citation of the first noun definition no longer exists. --BenjaminBarrett12 (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've cited as many senses as I could find, and de-tagged the ones with three citations as RFV-passed, and banished the others to the citations page as RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "technosexual" page.