Talk:tredecillionth
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: November 2019–January 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
DTLHS (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- I came here to say "don't bring obvious rubbish like quattuordecillionth to the RFV, just delete it" but then I found that it is in some (Google-scanned) books. Wow! But yes these do seem like "list words" like the phobias. Equinox ◑ 07:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- I have added what I could find to the respective citations pages, omitting all instances that are just in lists of large or small powers. The result is one cite each for tredecillionth and quindecillionth, and two for quattuordecillionth. Kiwima (talk) 00:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't find any other uses of them on Usenet, Issuu, or Scholar, nor in a Google search of Newspapers.com, nor in poking around Google News (in case that had pointers to any papers using the term). - -sche (discuss) 03:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)