Talk:wehrb

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TheDaveRoss in topic RFV discussion: March–October 2022

RFV discussion: June–August 2020

edit
 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Short for wehraboo, an entry that failed RFD. The cites given may not be CFI-durable. Equinox 20:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV

edit

This should not have passed RFV with the quotations currently listed. None of them are from durably archived sources (according to policy now/at the time, which I'm not saying is ideal in how it handles web material). 70.172.194.25 18:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: March–October 2022

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


This was closed as RFV-passed in 2020 without providing three durably archived cites: Talk:wehrb. Google Groups has nothing. — Fytcha T | L | C 16:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it is only recorded online, as far as I can tell. The only think that I can find that is arguably durably archived is this tweet from 2016 under the argument that the Library of Congress has a copy (see this post for overview), but it also seems very mention-y. As a side note, we can probably add wehrbette ([1]) to the list of non-CFI compliant terms. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ugh. I immediately knew what this meant, even though I've never seen it before. Terrible. Theknightwho (talk) 11:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Failed for now, this may be revisited if the CFI allows blogs and such, but it seems extremely rare even with social media included. - TheDaveRoss 14:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Return to "wehrb" page.