Template talk:merge
Latest comment: 1 year ago by ExcarnateSojourner in topic RFM discussion: March 2018–October 2022
ns switch edit
Each time this is misused in NS:0, it should add itself to a cleanup category and display {{see}} instead. Right? --Connel MacKenzie 15:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- We do redirect some variants of idiomatic phrases, and between titles with digraphs and those with separate unicode characters, so this could be useful in NS:0. --Bequw → τ 12:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
In an almost ridiculous turn of events, this template should itself be merged into {{rfm}}. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it seems like
{{rfm}}should default to "suggests that this ... be moved, merged or split" and should (does?) have a parameter to specify which one, and then{{merge}}and{{move}}and{{split}}should be shells that just consist of{{rfm|type=merge}}or the like. - -sche (discuss) 17:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Support -sche's proposal. I oppose just deleting {{merge}},{{move}}, and{{split}}, because I appreciate the specificity they give. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 06:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- This should probably be done now, because I got confused looking at the template, not sure if what I was seeing was the output of the template, or an actual RFM message! —Rua (mew) 20:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
