I speak these languages: (inactive)
noThis user is a native speaker of Norwegian.
nn-4Denne brukaren meistrar nynorsk på eit morsmålsnært nivå.
en-2This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.
da-2Denne bruger har et godt kendskab til dansk.
sv-2Den här användaren har medelgoda kunskaper i svenska.
de-1Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf grundlegendem Niveau.
Languages repeated underneath indicates level difference
I read these languages and scripts: (inactive)
en-4This user speaks English at a near-native level.
da-4Denne bruger kan dansk næsten på modersmålsniveau.
nl-2Deze gebruiker heeft basiskennis van het Nederlands.
af-1Hierdie gebruiker het basiese kennis van Afrikaans.
fy-1It Frysk fan dizze meidogger is minimaal.
fr-1Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
la-1Hic usor simplici lingua Latina conferre potest.
ia-1Iste usator ha cognoscentias de base de interlingua.
ru-1Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.
A
Latn
This user's native script is Latin.
Ж
Cyrl-3
This user has an advanced understanding of the Cyrillic script.
Ω
Grek-1
This user has a basic understanding of the Greek script.
Search user languages or scripts

You'll find my contributions here, as required.

I'm a conlanger, and a glossarch and primorator of Delang.



The following essay was originally written by Equinox (talkcontribs). It has since been amended by me.


There are five basic types of vandals on Wiktionary.

Spammer

edit
  • Doesn't actually know what Wiktionary is, or what wikis are, and cannot distinguish information from marketing, but has fallen for some SEO scum trick and thinks that spamming will actually make money. Just wants to edit entries at random and fill them with links to CHEAP VIAGRA or BEST KITCHEN WORKTOP SURFACE. Untalkable-to. The worst kind of vandal in the long term, because they have a commercial basis and if Wiktionary ever becomes popular then they will start to be funded by powerful corporations.

Bored

edit
  • Just vandalising for fun. Might deliberately exploit rules and customs in order to make the vandalism seem semi-acceptable, or to mire it in a load of arguments that will make everybody want to avoid it and allow it to hang around unchallenged for years. Worst kind of vandal after spammers, because some of them are amazingly persistent.

Single-issue

edit
  • Comes to Wiktionary in order to promote a single issue. Might have "invented a word" (in order to promote its Weblog, or some left- or right-wing political stance) and is keen that the new word, which nobody will ever use, gets published as widely as possible. Semi-literate. Likely to initiate long, droning arguments about wordiness of a word (without bothering to look at WT:CFI or consider whether a dictionary might have other issues than promoting one person's ideas), and will repeat these arguments on as many pages as possible. Quantity over quality.

Puerile

edit
  • Edits an entry in order to write "poop" or "niggers" or "Ben is gay". Probably a schoolchild in a computing class. Won't usually be back once blocked or reverted. Pretty harmless, but an annoying side-effect of allowing people to edit entries without signing up for accounts. Very numerous, especially at certain times of day.

Rules jockey

edit
  • A user who deletes any edit by claiming the edit does not comply with the rules. Such edits are deleted by applying the rules far more strictly than the rules indicates, including applying rules where they do not apply as claimed. These vandals keeps the wiki from being open source by overzealously harassing new users, and occasional users. Third worst type of vandals.