Russian quotations

edit

Hello,

Your quotations were very poor standard and formatting - this revision, this revision and this revision - totally unacceptable and require a lot of rework. I have fixed one at не́нависть (nénavistʹ) and reverted the other two we have noticed - pointed out in Talk:ненависть. Please learn to format them better first or seek assistance. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

No. You can't add stuff to the main page and expect someone to fix. If you're having trouble using existing templates as an example, then you shouldn't do it. You can still contribute with something simple, which is in your abilities while you are learning from examples. If you continue adding poor contents, you will be blocked. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked by Atitarev as you continued to make poorly formatted additions of quotes. If you wish to add quotes once your block expires please look at how the template {{quote-book}} is used in the ненависть entry. 37.110.218.43 11:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I only blocked for three days but I have little hope on improvement after the block expires. They've been adding quotations right next to existing well-formatted ones and after the warning. So, it doesn't seem to be of any help or not mature enough.
They can experiment in Wiktionary:Sandbox or your own sandbox, not in the main space.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Atitarev: 95.152.62.219 (most likely the same editor) is still adding quotation with poor formatting. —Svārtava (t/u) • 07:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Svartava: Thanks, reverted and blocked. I don't predict any improvement. The Russian orthography is slack as well. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 07:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Atitarev: How about just blocking the disruptive range so that they are kept from returning and evading the block? —Svārtava (t/u) • 10:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Svartava: Hi. Do we have new misuse cases? Regarding the range block, I don't want to make the decision myself - it should be discussed. Besides, I haven't done it and not sure how or if I have access to. @Chuck Entz will know how and if it's appropriate. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Atitarev: Hi, it seems they were back and made a couple of edits. Could you please review the edits at 95.152.0.0/18? Thanks in advance. —Svārtava (talk) • 14:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Svartava: Thanks, you seemed to have done it already. The IP is blocked. Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply



This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

RIR WHOIS lookup: America Europe Africa Asia-Pacific Latin America/Caribbean