Moonie edit

Please do not treat atributive uses of nouns as "adjectives". Almost every noun in the English language can be used attributively (e.g. computer table, health pamphlet, book review), but this does not make all nouns in English adjectives. Neither we nor any other dictionary would treat them as such. --EncycloPetey 13:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also, we never link from the text of a quotation to other articles. That's not why the quotations are there. --EncycloPetey 13:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I am new here. I didn't understand those points. I do think it would be better to use examples of the word used as a noun. Redddogg 13:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

cat edit

Whoa, not so fast. These are senses of the word. It doesn't matter that they were formed by shortening. See e.g. (deprecated template usage) intel for intelligence. It functions as a noun, not an abbreviation; likewise the ones you removed. Equinox 17:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice. Let's discuss on article's talk page. Redddogg 17:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

00:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

07:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)