Reconstruction talk:Proto-Turkic/āl

Related

Thanks for the information @Ardahan Karabağ. Proto-Mongolic *hulaxan 90% related to Proto-Tungusic *pula. Mongolics have -xan as in Reconstruction:Proto-Mongolic/temexen. @Xenos melophilos do you have a Khalaj form like hâl/hâal? Can you control it for us? BurakD53 (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

No bro. I would say the form hâl is a hypothesized word. I think it exist, but seemingly Doerfer didn't recorded the word.

Doerfer recorded ""qizil"" (a think like that) as the word for "rot" (red in german)

I don't see the word ""scharlach(rot)"" in his dictionary.

:(

I would suggest a reconstruction page for the word "hâal"

Just sayin Xenos melophilos (talk) 16:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

No problem. That means there is not. They may not be related, āl and pula. That's not clear. BurakD53 (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Halaçça'yı bu kadar önemli kılan nedir diller arasındaki ilişki konusunda? Ardahan Karabağ (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Söz başında daha eski *p- varsa Halaçça'da söz başı h- oluyor. En azından öyle olduğu söyleniyor. Ve Proto-Türkçe ve Göktürkçe söz sonu ń Halaç ve Arguda n olarak yaşıyor: Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/koń, Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/köń-. BurakD53 (talk) 18:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Sağ olun bilgi için. Ardahan Karabağ (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)