Talk:Graaf

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: February–April 2017

RFD discussion: February–April 2017 edit

 

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Dutch. There is already a lower-case form graaf; upper-case is either reserved for titles or is characteristic of use centuries ago, not of current use. (On a different note, parts of the etymology seem dubious, as the ONW has a lemma for grāvo.) Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Note that we also have earl / Earl, so I'm not sure what to think. Your point about the ety does stand though, it needs cleanup to account for the Old Dutch term. — Kleio (t · c) 17:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "Graaf" page.