Talk:Pr
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Wikitiki89 in topic RFC discussion: April 2014
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is a Translingual term with a usex in English, but the {{usex}} template requires a language code- resulting in the template adding the entry to the non-existent Category:Translation requests (Translingual). Chuck Entz (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- So just don't use
{{usex}}, or use {{usex|lang=en}} since the usex is English even though the term is translingual? - -sche (discuss) 01:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)- I endorse both of -sche's solutions, but also suggest a third: remove the usex and possibly make it part of the definition. --WikiTiki89 07:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I prefer {{usex|lang=en}} because translingual is defined to be "many languages". --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz, -sche, Wikitiki89 What if we change line 55 of Module:usex to
if not translation and lang ~= "en" and lang ~= "mul" and lang ~= "und" then? --kc_kennylau (talk) 03:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)- No, "Translingual" is not a language, so you can't have a usage example in "Translingual". --WikiTiki89 03:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz, -sche, Wikitiki89 What if we change line 55 of Module:usex to
- I prefer {{usex|lang=en}} because translingual is defined to be "many languages". --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I endorse both of -sche's solutions, but also suggest a third: remove the usex and possibly make it part of the definition. --WikiTiki89 07:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)