Talk:abundant-number
RFV edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Needs citations showing (a) that it exists at all, and (b) that it exists with the POS claimed, i.e. as an adjective or "adjective comparative forms" rather than a noun. There are no instances of it in the COCA or BNC, and Google Books hits, even for compounds like "abundant(-| )number sum", "abundant(-| )number factor" and "abundant(-| )number divisor", are unhyphenated or entirely nonexistent. the entry is currently badly formatted, using one thing as the POS header and a different thing on the headword-line, and containing a blank usex. - -sche (discuss) 22:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is another of Msh210's 2007 creations, see #frictional-unemployment above. --Hekaheka (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Donnanz (talk) 17:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)