Talk:bosspot
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: June–July 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
One possible use in BGC. From the same editor as pluggle above (seems to add a lot of suspect terms). — surjection ⟨??⟩ 11:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have added two cites, but have yet to find a third. Kiwima (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Did you mean to post this in another section? I don't see any edits to this term.Chuck Entz (talk) 04:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz Kiwima put them at Citations:bosspot in the expectation that the entry will be deleted. This, that and the other (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- It was all an interlocking sequence of trivial oversights: Kiwima saved her post at 04:40, her edit to the citations page at 4:44, and I saved my post (with three tildes, instead of four- now fixed) at 04:46. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz Kiwima put them at Citations:bosspot in the expectation that the entry will be deleted. This, that and the other (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Did you mean to post this in another section? I don't see any edits to this term.Chuck Entz (talk) 04:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 23:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)