Talk:disculus visionis digitalis
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Robert.Baruch in topic RFD discussion: April 2018
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Seems unlikely to exist, as we don't have an entry for disculus. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean? We don't have an entry yet, but it's trivially attestable. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 10:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- I've now added an entry for disculus. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 06:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. There's a cite already on the page, and Latin is not a WDL. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 10:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. There is a quotation from the Vatican. Because this is arguably the highest authority for modern Latin, I vote to immediately remove the RFD. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Decision: Keep. disculus is now an entry, and well-attested back to the 19th century. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK. So, can disculus mean diskette or floppy disk? SemperBlotto (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe neither? It just seems to mean a little disc. Diskette seems to mean a magnetic medium, which CDs and DVDs are not. I don't think disculus == diskette. ---Robert.Baruch (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- OK. So, can disculus mean diskette or floppy disk? SemperBlotto (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)