Talk:oft mentioned
Latest comment: 7 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: December 2015–May 2016
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
This seems to be a sum of parts. It would be protected by WT:COALMINE if "oft mentioned" were significantly more common than oftmentioned, but it is approximately similarly common per oft mentioned, oftmentioned at Google Ngram Viewer, and therefore, does not seem protected by WT:COALMINE.
By contrast, oft-mentioned with hyphen is protected by WT:COALMINE since it is significantly more common per oft-mentioned, oftmentioned at Google Ngram Viewer. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Put in
{{alternative form of|oftmentioned|lang=en}}- it is overly bureaucratic to delete it, especially since it seems to be used just as much as oftmentioned. —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 00:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Not idiomatic and not a work in a language. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per RM. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as an alternative-form-of. bd2412 T 03:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious from the two words; many similar constructs occur, e.g. oft vaunted. Equinox ◑ 03:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 08:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. bd2412 T 16:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)