If you can't find any descendants, you should probably not create the entry. That's what I do anyway. Angr or Anglom might know some.

CodeCat22:22, 18 September 2016

Matasović seems reliable, but I see your point. I'll refrain from adding descendantless reconstructions in the future.

UtherPendrogn (talk)22:32, 18 September 2016
 

Matasović seems reliable, but I see your point. I'll refrain from adding descendantless reconstructions in the future.

UtherPendrogn (talk)22:32, 18 September 2016

By the way, {{R:cel:Matasovic 2009}} is a pre-made template for citing Matasovic. If you find yourself using a source often, I advise creating a reference template to allow for quick and standardized citation.

JohnC501:44, 19 September 2016

Thanks, but do notice I'm using a revised copy and not the original.

UtherPendrogn (talk)05:18, 19 September 2016

Oh, I did, but I'm telling you for when you use the main dictionary. As the second edition does not yet exist, I may create a separate template for the addenda or perhaps one for the whole first edition with addenda. Regardless, when you use a source a bunch, please think about making a template. Also, I've created {{R:cel:Delamarre}} for you. —JohnC5 06:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

JohnC506:03, 19 September 2016

Thanks!

UtherPendrogn (talk)06:20, 19 September 2016