The Tran Dynasty

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Vininn126 (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Including obsolete terms

I saw your comment, thought I'd explain. I don't see why we shouldn't include obsolete terms. It's not like they aren't words, and often they are the missing piece in a chain or help understand the historic development, etc. etc. We'd have to exclude things like Ancient Greek, since technically, no one speaks that way. Vininn126 (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry just saw this—-I forgot what specific page I left that comment on, but my reasoning is that Wiktionary does have specific pages for historical ancestors languages to separate them from current languages and current usage; there’s a page for Middle English and Old English for example. Same for Middle French, Old Japanese, etc. Obsolete terms are related to a word in etymology and historical usage, but not in its current usage, and there’s a multitude of obsolete terms with multiple spellings due to the historical lack of standardization; should the English “me” page include the obsolete emphatic “mee”? It’s one thing to include archaic forms of a term as they may still be seen in some older texts, but it doesn’t seem as important to include obsolete terms in parts that are meant to denote current usage, as the very definition of “obsolete” is no longer in current use nor currently recognizable in older texts.

I’m not saying obsolete terms aren’t important, just that they shouldn’t be included in an entry outside of the etymology section, and this seems to be standard practice due to the above example. The Tran Dynasty (talk) 19:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Don't think that the only obsolete forms are Middle English etc. Modern English can have obsolete meanings, like from the 19th century. Vininn126 (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

yea I know, just that you dealt with two different topics in your original comment—-historical languages and historical terms, and combined them to a theme of “historical parts of a language”—-and I tried addressing both parts. but I did write my message in a bit of a rush/while multitasking so sorry if some parts were a bit ambigious. The Tran Dynasty (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)