Wiktionary:Information desk

Wiktionary > Discussion rooms > Information desk

You can search in the archives of Information desk:

Welcome to the Information desk of Wiktionary, a place where newcomers can ask questions about words and about Wiktionary, ask for help, or post miscellaneous ideas that don’t fit in any of the other rooms.

To start a new topic, clicking on the “+” tab, or click here: Start a new topic.

Sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), code which produces your signature, followed by a UTC timestamp.

For past questions, see /Archives.

September 2015

accessing existing templatesEdit

How does one access existing templates to copy and modify for new articles? For example, I would like to model a conjugation table for the Czech verb "nosit" after the existing template for the Czech verb "nest". Likewise, I would like to model new conjugation tables for Slovenian verbs that lack them after existing templates.

Templates are just pages on the wiki. You can see them by adding "Template:" to the name of a template and going to that page. —CodeCat 20:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Copying Bulgarian information and using it for Macedonian.Edit

A number of Bulgarian word definitions I find are similar to Macedonian with some slight differences in usage and these aspects are missing in some Macedonian entries, can I take the information from the Bulgarian posts and only if I have to modify it or is there something else I have to do?

Copying information isn't a problem if you know the languages well enough- if it's correct, it doesn't matter where you got it from (copyright and plagiarism issues aside). Where you could get into trouble is with the formatting: some templates may be different in some of the details (or even have no counterpart), and language codes would need to be changed. For instance {{etyl|sla-pro|bg}} might look like just a way to output "Proto-Slavic" in etymologies, but it would put your Macedonian entry in Category:Bulgarian terms derived from Proto-Slavic- you would want {{etyl|sla-pro|mk}} instead. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Word that can be both a preposition and a postposition?Edit

According to Wikipedia, this would be called an ambiposition, although this term also has other meanings. Should we use this as a POS header and category? If not, what alternative is there? —CodeCat 20:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I think we can just call it a preposition. The important thing is that it is word that takes a noun as an argument and creates an adverbial or adjectival (or possibly other) phrase. --WikiTiki89 21:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
A preposition goes before its phrase, so it wouldn't be correct for a postposition. I'm asking this for the case of Northern Sami, which has prepositions, postpositions and ambipositions. They're all part of the same general word class, yes, but they're still distinct. Surely we need to indicate which is which? —CodeCat 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Etymologically, you're right, but this is a useless distinction. For example, adverbs don't have to modify verbs and French has adjectives that come after the noun and some that come before the noun, but that doesn't mean we need to have two separate parts of speech for them. We can just mention in our glossary that our definition of preposition also includes postpositions and ambipositions. --WikiTiki89 21:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Or we could use "adposition" instead. I oppose using "preposition" for anything other than a preposition. —CodeCat 21:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
That would be nice, except that none of our readers would have any clue what "adposition" would mean. According to Oxford Dictionaries, a preposition is "A word governing, and usually preceding, a noun or pronoun [] " (emphasis mine), so I don't see the problem with classifying postpositions as prepostions. --WikiTiki89 22:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
As long as we use "Postposition" and "Circumposition" as headers and categories, "Preposition" must refer to preposed words by default. So if we are to use "preposition" in this odd generic sense, then at the very least you should make a proposal to merge headers and categories for all other adpositions to "preposition". —CodeCat 23:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
That is basically what I was saying. You want me to make a formal proposition? (Also, by your definition, is from not a preposition in Where is that from?) --WikiTiki89 20:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
That would definitely be a "dangling" preposition. from still precedes its NP before the syntactic move stage. If it had been pied-piped, that relationship would have been clearer. At this phase, since many speakers would find *From where is that? ungrammatical, we normally analyze that use of from as the particle compliment of a particle verb. —JohnC5 21:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
But nevertheless, from is not preceding a noun, so I'm sarcastically asking CodeCat: how can we call it a "preposition"? --WikiTiki89 15:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Roger that! Sarcasm noted. :)JohnC5 13:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Where can I request the creation of new Macedonian conjugation charts or where can I get help with this?Edit

Macedonian needs a new conjugation chart for verbs that use a noun or who require short pronoun clitics to show person. Where can I go to request this or who can I work with to make this?

Mention of Late Latin wordEdit

In trying to create an Ethymology section, I see Wiktionary often uses {{etyl}} and {{m}}. The former supports "LL." as parameter, but {{m}} produces an error, "The language code is not valid". E.g. {etyl|LL.|ang}} {{m|LL.|bisaccium}}. (I tried some variations but no luck.) What should be used here? –Krinkle 13:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Late Latin is what we call an "etymology-only language". We consider it a form of Latin, but we categorize it separately from Classical Latin for purposes of etymologies. That means you can use LL. inside {{etyl}}, but inside {{m}} (and {{l}} and {{t}} for that matter}}, you have to use la: {{etyl|LL.|ang}} {{m|la|bisaccium}}. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

"invariable" vs "indeclinable"Edit

Currently, Swahili adjectives that do not inflect have the former on the headword-line but the latter is used for the category. Which is preferable/clearer, or is the current bipolar situation actually a good thing? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Adding pronunciationsEdit

Hi, I'm thinking about adding audio files for the Portuguese entries in the dictionary. I downloaded the list of members of the Category "Portuguese lemmas" (~45k), randomized it, and started recording. Uploading the files to commons also seems simple enough to automate. My only concern is: is there any recommended automated way of batch editing the Wiktionary in order to link to the commons files?

By the way, I'd be grateful for feedback on these samples: --Artefacto (talk) 01:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Excellent! Be sure to tag the accent of the pronunciations (Lisbon, right?). If you prefer, I have a list of Portuguese words sorted by frequency here. The advantage over Portuguese lemmas is that it includes common inflected forms (surely words like está needs pronunciation more urgently than the likes of agronomicamente), but it doesn’t include phrases. Feel free to contact me if you have any question regarding our Portuguese content.
As for automation, you can use WT:AWB or a bot. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
It's my undertanding that User:DerbethBot, run by User:Derbeth, automatically finds audio files that exist on Commons but aren't in entries, and adds them to entries. - -sche (discuss) 02:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Please make sure files are properly named (correct: File:Pt-país.ogg incorrect: File:Bloco de Esquerda.ogg) and placed in commons:Category:Portuguese pronunciation. My bot will then add them automatically. --Derbeth talk 05:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


It's a German verb with a 'weak past' which qualifies it for the category 'German weak verbs', but it's class 7 strong. Should there be some kind of note stating its irregularities in the entry? ~Eloquio (talk) 18:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Seax; worth adding this additional use?Edit

Hi all,

I've noticed that in the UK, Seax also relates to the Essex County Council Records Office archive searching tool / application; http://seax.essexcc.gov.uk/.

Initially, I thought this was an acronym for "Search Essex Archives... something" or "Storehouse of Essex Archives...something", and queried the acronym with the office via email, out of curiosity more than anything. They came back to say that Seax in their usage for the search application isn't an acronym at all, but is the name given to a sword or dagger (as the Wiktionary entry correctly states), and that which appears on the Essex Coat of Arms, viewable here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essex.

Not being able to find the abbreviation details on-line, I just wondered if it was worth me adding something to the seax article to cover this use by Essex County Council?


Jams Watton (talk) 08:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Hmm. Well, the search system (that I have actually used in my family history research) is called Seax though, of course, its name is derived from seax. Can you find, in say Google book search or similar, three independent uses of the term? If so, we could have an entry for it. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Trying to make an editEdit

I'm sure I'm making some stupid mistake here, but I'm trying to update this page: https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0

As you can see from the word at the start of the page and in the table on the right, the word should be прокуратура. However, in the Морфологические и синтаксические свойства section, it is just "прокурату́р". I'm just trying to add the 'a' onto the end. It tells me to talk to an administrator, but I can't figure out how. I'm sorry for bothering you with this, but I can't seem to figure out what to do.

Whether it's a mistake or not, it's there (Russian Wiktionary), not here (English Wiktionary). Maybe one of our editors who also edits over there (@Atitarev, Stephen G. Brown, Wikitiki89, Cinemantique) can help you. Chuck Entz (talk) Chuck Entz (talk) 00:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I made the change with no problem (and I'm not even an admin there or anything). --WikiTiki89 14:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why it let you and not me, but thanks for the help! —This unsigned comment was added by Feliciaspb (talkcontribs) at 10:45, 12 September 2015.

It seems to be happening with other pages too. Like when I tried to add a stress mark to the word on this page: https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C Is there anything I can do, or should I just not be trying to edit these pages? —This unsigned comment was added by Feliciaspb (talkcontribs) at 11:37, 12 September 2015.

Well what exactly happens when you try to edit the page? --WikiTiki89 15:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
This sort of sounds like some kind of abuse filter that looks at edit counts. Maybe if they do a few minor edits like fixing typos it will give them enough edits to clear the threshold. Another possibility is a block, perhaps of their IP or even range of IPs. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Creating a Wikitionary for a language - a comprehensive guideEdit

Hi Team mates,

My mother tongue is Tulu which is spoken in the Dakshina Kannada region in the State of Karnataka, India. Because the population of speakers is small, it is not recognized to the degree that it needs to be. I have a Facebook group, where we have created a document with a containing both English and Tulu words (written in English alphabet). Was hoping for guidance in starting one for Tulu. I have been hunting for a comprehensive set of steps (to serve as my checklist of sorts). Hope to hear back from my team-mates here. —This unsigned comment was added by Ravikallianpur (talkcontribs) at 15:06, 16 September 2015.

Note that it may be more useful to just help out with Tulu here on the English Wiktionary. We already have a number of entries in Tulu (see Category:Tulu lemmas). You can use those as a guide to create more entries. If you really want to create a Tulu-language Wiktionary, you can follow the instructions at incubator:Wt/tcy. --WikiTiki89 15:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

latin verbsEdit

In the etymology section, when latin verbs are mentioned, only three forms are given : active present singular first person (ex : timeo, I fear), the active present infinitive form (timere, to fear), the active perfect singular first person (timui, I feared) and that's all. However in latin, when you have to cite a verb, you normally have to cite 5 forms. In addition to the three that was used above, one normally have to use the active present singular second person ( times, you fear ; between timeo and timere) and the last form that has to be given is "supine" (in latin supinus but there is no corresponding form in English so it is difficult to explain. In fact, this form is only used when the verb has to complete a verb that gives a movement like "to go") that doesn't exist for all verbs but if it exists, this form has to be given. (Here for timere, it is timitum). So, in this example, the correct way to name the verb to fear in latin is : "timeo, times, timere, timui, timitum" because without that it is impossible to determine all the conjugation of this verb.

That's not true; the standard forms given, known as the principal parts, are essentially what we give on Latin headword-lines as it is. Etymologies need only give the lemma. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 23:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Adya CeramicEdit

An item called "Adya Ceramic" Filter system, a trade name or a item?

Is hound inherited/descended from *ḱwṓ?Edit

From a purely phonological point of view, this is clearly false, as the modern word has a dental consonant in it that the Proto-Indo-European word lacks, which cannot be explained through regular sound changes. Yet it's obvious that it's still derived from it. So I am wondering, can hound be considered a direct descendant of *ḱwṓ? Or is it a descendant of a derived form of it? Would we consider hound to be inherited from PIE, even though it is not a phonological descendant of a PIE form? —CodeCat 21:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I would not call it a direct descendant of *ḱwṓ. PG *hundaz is presumed to come from *ḱuntós, which is comes from the same root as *ḱwṓ does, but there is (AFAIK) no extra-Germanic evidence for *ḱuntós, so we can't be sure that the form with the dental extension is even IE in provenance. It's a descendant of the root *ḱun- for sure, but not of the noun *ḱwṓ. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Why isn't this in the WT:ES? --WikiTiki89 14:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
It was intended as a more general question to assess what we might consider "inheritance". If you think it should be moved, feel free to. —CodeCat 14:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
You gave me a legitimate answer, so no need to move. Anyway, I don't understand the purpose of your question. Do you want to know whether hound should be listed at in the list of descendants at *ḱwṓ and whether *ḱwṓ can be listed in the etymology of hound? Then the answer is yes, but with an explanation that there was some form in between. --WikiTiki89 15:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
She probably wants to know whether she can use {{inherited}} all the way back to PIE or whether it needs to stop at PGmc. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Aha, so the question is really about the category Category:English terms inherited from Proto-Indo-European. I'm not sure why we need to make a distinction between "derived" and "inherited", but since we are, I would say that hound is not "inherited" from *ḱwṓ (but is "derived"). --WikiTiki89 15:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Why do Romanians use bad spelling?Edit

Almost all of the Romanians that I’ve met use bad spelling that’s difficult to comprehend, like typing ‘cat’ for cât. My best guess is that the ‘Romanian (Programmers)’ keyboard layout is used frequently and they can’t figure out how to type Romanian letters on it. Other Romanian keyboards don’t have that problem (as far as I know). I want to continue learning Romanian, but the informal writing is very annoying. --Romanophile (talk) 01:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Count Dracula feeds on diacritics. They are deleeceeous. —CodeCat 01:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
At least Romanian is not tonal. Imagine trying to decipher text messages in Vietnamese when they're written using the standard Latin letters only... Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Copying/creating templatesEdit

Template:!! here appears to be the same as v:Template:!!, w:Template:!!, and commons:Template:!!. With respect to creating templates here, if I copy a template from say Wikipedia and bring it here for use. Do I need to cite where I copied it from? Or, is there a general okay to copy templates and if necessary modify here for use? --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

When you copy a template from Wikipedia (or Wikisource, Wikibooks, etc.), please at least link the original template in the edit summary. If nothing else, if anything goes wrong with the template, we'll use that information when discussing whether the template could be fixed or deleted.
Also, Special:Import is supposed to import pages with the full history for crediting purposes, but it seemed to be broken last time I checked. I don't know if it's working now, maybe someone else does. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


Is it usually taught in schools that man can refer to a human being of either sex? --Romanophile (contributions) 05:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Don't know. But we go on actual usage, not what is taught. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
    • I think throughout my schooling my teachers may have mentioned a few times that "man" can refer to humans in general. I was certainly never taught that "man" must refer to a male. --WikiTiki89 19:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Newer books don't seem to do that; it leaps out at me as quite dated when I see it. Schools here would probably avoid it like the plague now. Equinox 01:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
A man can only imagine the hissyfit progressives would throw if a school dared to tell their students that it can. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
In my experience "man" being used to refer to humans in general, like "mankind" in place of "humankind", are past English usage and no longer current usage, just as we no longer describe an exclamation as an "ejaculation" in current usage even though that was once common. When I was in school in the late 70s and early 80s, I sometimes encountered books from earlier decades (or centuries) which used "man" and "mankind" in the manner formerly common, but I was not taught that was acceptable usage for my own writing. More accurate language seems like the better choice to me, so I'm in favor of the current usage of "people" or "humans", and "humankind" or "humanity". —GrammarFascist (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Are you serious ?? Or are you just wishfully dreaming ? Of course mankind is still current--it may not seem as overly hyper-sensitive as "humankind" among a few fringe groups, but is still the general term. Talk about being too cutting edge. Ow. It amazes me the things I read here sometimes... :) Leasnam (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't lose faith in mankind just because of one Grammar Fascist. --WikiTiki89 03:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Unless I'm badly misreading it, the question was about what is taught in schools, not what should be taught in schools. —GrammarFascist (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
But your answer didn't mention schools. --WikiTiki89 18:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
In what way does the sentence beginning "When I was in school in the late 70s and early 80s..." not count as mentioning schools? —GrammarFascist (talk) 07:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

two questionsEdit

In English we use the term "X education" to describe some key types of teaching, e.g. early childhood education. What do we call these two types of teaching: 1) The teaching of morals and ethics in the classroom. 2) Teaching of children by their parents in the home about what is considered appropriate behaviour, ways of thinking, etc. Thanks. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

For #1, if you mean what I think you mean, then for me (UK, 1990s) it was PSE (personal social education). Singapore has CCE (character and citizenship education). Some countries just call it citizenship. Equinox 02:30, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
If what you say is true, we are missing a sense at citizenship. I can't think of what the Australian equivalent might be, if there is one. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Ooh, I just found w:character education, this looks very close. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Also civics. Equinox 02:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Download as PDFEdit

"Download as PDF" does not include translations. Shouldn't this be changed? --Spiros71 (talk) 08:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Definitely, but I have no idea who to report it to. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


Hi, I'm trying to fulfil some of the Welsh translation requests (using the assisted 'add translation' box - as you can probably tell, I know precious little about correctly formatting things manually). I'd like to add a translation for 'lung' (noun, a biological organ that extracts oxygen from the air). In Welsh, the normal form of this is 'ysgyfaint', which is plural, denoting the lungs as a pair. In both of the dictionaries I've checked (Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru and Geiriadur yr Academi), 'ysgyfaint' is given as the lemma. The singular 'ysgyfant' is only noted as 'occ.' (Geiriadur yr Academi) and 'diw.' (recent/modern, GPC). When I'm adding the translation of 'lung', therefore, should I be adding the singular 'ysgyfant' or the more widely used plural, and lemma, 'ysgyfaint'? I'm afraid I don't how to add a UTC timestamp to this message. Glassapple (talk) 14:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd use ysgyfaint as the lemma form; the GPC entry makes it pretty clear that ysgyfant is a back-formation, and not even a particularly common one. In fact ysgyfaint even has a plural of its own, ysgyfeiniau/ysgyfeinau, which presumably means "pairs of lungs", suggesting that before the back-formation was created, ysgyfaint wasn't even felt as a plural. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Glassapple (talk) 16:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Android app for .ogg files?Edit

Is there any app I can download for my Android cell phone to create .ogg audio files that could be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for Portuguese pronunciations? (I don't have a microphone for my PC, I could borrow one easily but that'd not be my first option)

The apps I have on my cell phone create mp3 files, so alternatively, a software for my PC that can convert mp3->ogg easily in a bulk would be acceptable too.

I checked this page but it didn't seem helpful for Android apps:

--Daniel Carrero (talk) 11:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit request for Module:languages/dataxEdit

I'd like to request the following to be added to Module:languages/datax:

m["art-ldp"] = {
        canonicalName = "Lidepla",
        otherNames = "Lingwa de Planeta",
        type = "appendix-constructed",
        scripts = {"Latn"},
        family = "art",

It is for the conlang w:Lingwa de planeta, better known as Lidepla.

Aryamanarora (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
To judge from the discussion at Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2015/October#Lingwa de Planeta, this suggestion appears have no consensus. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Entry for "that guy"Edit

I created "that guy" yesterday. It was only my second new entry here, and I suspect I've done at least something wrong in formatting and/or filling it in. I would appreciate it if a more experienced Wiktionarian (is that the term?) would look at it and give me some feedback and/or make corrections. Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I think you've done a great job ! I made one addition though, I added the plural form Leasnam (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement, Leasnam, and for your edit. (I had actually put the plural in originally, but DixtosaBOT removed it.) Thanks also to Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV, Dixtosa, Wikitiki89, Ēloquiō, and Sonofcawdrey for their edits to the entry. Apologies if the notifications annoyed any of you; I'm used to social norms at English Wikipedia and still learning my way here. —GrammarFascist (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Are there non-yearly holidays?Edit

Not a linguistic question as such, but it is about categorising terms. Do all holidays or other observances, in all languages, occur once every year, or are there also ones that occur with a different frequency? —CodeCat 01:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, Leap Year Day is the first thing that comes to mind. I would think there would also be irregular observances based on astronomical events in some cultures that pay attention to such things (would you count a blue moon, for instance?). Then there are various one-time observations for such things as significant occurrences in the life of a monarch, significant anniversaries or events such as deaths, achievements, or honors. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
unbirthday ? SemperBlotto (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Since the lunar calendar is 11 days shorter than the solar calendar, it's possible for a holiday that occurs annually in the lunar calendar to occur twice in the same Gregorian year. But that's probably not what you meant. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
No, that's still more or less yearly. —CodeCat 20:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Some Jewish holidays that are not yearly: Shabbat (weekly), Rosh Chodesh (monthly), Hakhel (every seven years). --WikiTiki89 15:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
And as for Birkat Hachama ... never mind. (;-)
To some extent, it actually is a linguistic question. I've had people come to me and seriously posit that Shabbat can't be a "holiday", because it comes every week. But I think there are really plenty of counterexamples here already. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
There are festivals in Ancient Rome (Ăgōnālĭa, for instance) and in India (Navratri) celebrated more than once a year, though one could interpret them as groups made up of individual once-a-year festivals.The same goes for the two Eids in Islam. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

How to add alternate meaning and respective alternate etymology to word "argh"Edit

I would like to edit the entry for "argh" to also show the middle English sense of "cowardly, lazy, slow, wretched"[1], but I am not sure what the best practice implementation is. What is the correct way to add both an alternate etymology and a corresponding alternate meaning? Thanks! --Mavaddat (talk) 07:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ "Argh / Definition of argh by Merriam-Webster", Merriam-Webster. URL accessed on 2015-11-10.
First of all, we treat Middle English as a separate language, with the language code "enm", so you would add a completely separate language section, not just a separate etymology. As for best practice: see WT:EL for our entry layout standards. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Chuck Entz! I was perhaps not clear in referring to the middle English. I meant that the sense has carried over from middle English. --Mavaddat (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
You would need to change Etymology to 'Etymology 1', and increase Level of each current subheader; then add a second L3 header for 'Etymology 2', and repeat. Leasnam (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I went ahead and did it, so that you can see how it's done for next time :) Leasnam (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Argh!! So cool. Thank you Leasnam! ☺

"interpretating" vs "interpreting"Edit

The article "The Kochen-Specker Theorem" of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has as its second sentence (my emphasis):

The theorem demonstrates the impossibility of a certain type of interpretation of QM in terms of hidden variables (HV) that naturally suggests itself when one begins to consider the project of interpretating QM.

Now my question is, is the word interpretating an error for interpreting, or is it some kind of neologism with a distinct but related meaning? e.g. maybe "interpretating" means "to construct philosophical interpretations of a theory", which is a much more specific meaning than just "interpreting". Any thoughts? SJK (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


The entry needs to be improved, see Wiktionary:Grease_pit/2015/October#Neger. -Rdm571 (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

impersonal subject 'It'Edit

Hi, I'm Isabelle from South Korea, teaching English. I need some help. Look at the passage following, and think about 'it'.

Thanks to the cold weather, the Eleven Cities Tour took place on January 4. It was the first time in 11 years, since 1986.

My question is ------ about 'It'. Is It impersonal subject referring 'time'? My grammar book says it is. But in my point of view, it refers the Eleven Cities Tour. I'm confused a lot. Please give me some tips. —This unsigned comment was added by Isabelle730428 (talkcontribs).

  • This use of it is our first definition:- "The third-person singular personal pronoun used to refer to an inanimate object, to an inanimate thing with no or unknown sex or gender.". I shall add a note (or usage example) to show the word being used to refer to a previously used term. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


There was a demand for the suffix counterpart for Special:PrefixIndex. So I created it. example.

Ask and thou shalt receive. It is slow so use it wisely, though.--Dixtosa (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Not quite an exact counterpart, since you must provide a category. If it is not too much to ask, could you add the option to leave the category blank? --WikiTiki89 17:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Done. --Dixtosa (talk) 17:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --WikiTiki89 01:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Potestatemology - The study of powerEdit

I would like to suggest that a word be added to Wiktionary.

That word is "Potestatemology" which is the study of power.

It is comprised of the Latin root for 'power', which is "potestatem" and the suffix for study of "ology."

An example of usage would be:

Policy makers must study all the categories of Potestatemology when formulating strategies that deal with the motivations of terrorists; not just ideology and politics.

Potestatemology would include political science, ideology and the psychology of power (to name a few). —This unsigned comment was added by Echo1111 (talkcontribs).

  • We are not interested in invented words. Feel free to use the word yourself. If it catches on and other people find it useful then it will get into print (or even into blogs) - then, and only then, will we include it. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Replacing a conjugation table and associated linksEdit

Hello, everyone!

I noticed that the conjugation table for the verb entreter in Portuguese is wrong (since it's not a regular verb, but an irregular verb conjugated like ter) and I'd like to change it. If I do just that, will the links that were previously created for the non-existent verb forms disappear from Wiktionary too (for example, "entreto", which should be "entretenho")? Is there any way to undo this issue or to delete those pages later? Thank you in advance. Luisftd (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

I’ve amended the entry and tagged the nonstandard forms as such (they do exist). — Ungoliant (falai) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Need help figuring out what replaced Template:Obsolete for obsolete wordsEdit

I searched Beer parlour and gather that it used to exist. What replaced it? Thanks. Quercus solaris (talk) 23:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

It was replaced by a generic template for all context labels: {{label}} (or {{lb}} for short). Used like this: {{lb|en|obsolete}}. Also, keep in mind that on Wiktionary, template names are case-sensitive even on the first character. --WikiTiki89 02:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Adding lots of Nyunga wordsEdit

Hi all,

I'm a bit new around here. I spend most of my time on Wikisource, only coming over to Wiktionary to add words or citations that garner my notice in some way. But now I have fallen in with a new crowd: a group of academics, Wikimedians, and others who are working to add material to Wikimedia projects relating to Noongar culture and language. The first idea was to work towards creating a Wikipedia in Nyunga language (oh, um, yes: there are various spellings for this), but then the first part of that comes to be figuring out a dictionary of the language. Thus, hullo to Wiktionary! :-)

Basically, there are a bunch of wordlists available, that have been recorded over the last 180 years or so, and we're adding those that we can to Wikisource. There are also a bunch that are more modern, which can serve as source material but of course cannot be made available verbatim online. I've got a bunch of questions about using oral histories as sources... :-) Anyway, I've taken some of these sources and tried to produce Wiktionary entries from them.

The results, and various other notes, are at User:Samwilson/Noongarpedia. I'd love anyone's feedback there.

Thanks! :-) — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 10:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Sam! I recommend that you take a look at our WT:Criteria for inclusion, especially the section WT:CFI#Number of citations. Note that Noongar will certainly not be considered a "language well documented on the Internet", and thus will not be subject to our stricter requirements for such languages. --WikiTiki89 19:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, certainly not a well-documented language, and it's hard to find actual citations (i.e. that aren't just part of word lists; although some of them give short usage examples). I wasn't quite sure if the {{LDL}} template should be added to every Nyunga entry; should it? There's also going to be a fair bit of cleaning up of these entry templates I've made, especially with regard to alternate spellings. Thanks for your help! — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 23:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it should. You may find that entries that should have {{LDL}} actually don't have it, but they all should have it. --WikiTiki89 15:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ah cool, thanks. I'll update all existing ones with {{LDL|nys}}, and add it to the text of the new entries. — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 23:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

I and J in German frakturEdit

In some German frakturs I and J have the same shape. In many cases, especially in case of German words, it's clear what's the correct letter. But what's with e.g. Iambos/Jambos (alternative form of Jambus, meaning iambus, iamb)? In some older or newer books maybe antiqua is used for that, so it's clear which form they use, but it could be that it was earlier Jambos (-os is a common Latin ending) and nowadays Iambos (making it more Greekish - such forms are usually less common). So, are such sources which use one character for I and J ignored as it's not clear whether it's I or J? Or is it ℑ𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔬𝔰 (well, there's 𝔍 too...)? - 12:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

If no clues exist to suggest whether a letter is I or J, I would interpret it as whichever of the two German uses now. In this case, in addition to the fact that the word is now spelled with J, we have one strong and one weaker clue that the ambiguous glyph is J. The weaker clue is that several books which otherwise use Fraktur set some or all instances of the word in Antiqua, and use J:
  • 1642, Johann Peter Titz, Zwey Bücher von der Kunst hochdeutsche Verse und Lieder zu machen, chapter 10:
    ... das erſte Glied des Verſes vor dem Abſchritt einerley / und das ander nach dem Abſchritt auch einerley Pedes begreiffet. So helt infolgenden das erſte theil[sic] drey Jambos, das ander ſo viel Trochæos.
  • 1827, Gesammelte Werke der Brüder Christian und Friedrich Leopold Grafen zu Stolberg, volume 17, part 1:
    [uses the same character for ?ambos, ?iamben, Insel, and Jahr, but then it has in Antiqua Archilochum proprio rabies armavit Jambo]
The strong clue is that numerous Fraktur books which use ?ambos also use jambisch(e) and none use iambisch(e). In contrast, all but one of the handful of books which google books:"Iambos" "iambisch|iambische" turns up are Antiqua. Many books use ?ambos in contexts that suggest J is meant, and only one uses it in a context that suggests I is meant. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that ?ambos is Jambos.
If the only attestations of a word provide no clues as to whether I or J is meant (the word died out without ever being spelled in Antiqua), it may be appropriate to have two entries (one a hard or soft redirect to the other), as is done for ח𐰂𐰵𐰆𐰺𐰇𐰢/𐰸𐰵𐰆𐰺𐰇𐰢 and ᚅᚓᚆᚆᚈᚑᚅᚅ/ᚅᚓᚆᚆᚈᚑᚅᚄ.
- -sche (discuss) 03:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, -sche. (BTW: Fraktur "Jambos" and "iambisch" can be found too, as in books.google.de/books?id=zGeTciCzC6IC&pg=PA290 , so one could assume that it is "Iambos" there.) - 18:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Simply adding a reference to the use of a word.Edit

Reading an old book I have found a word I did not know the meaning of. Wiktionary has the word with no description but one reference to its use. I have found a use of it from 1582. Without spending hours learning all about Wiktionary, how do I simply post a reference to the source I have come across? I don't want a lesson, just the simple steps. I am not in possession of the standard of English required to be an enthusiastic contributor.Hawley1560 (talk)

Your English sounds like that of a native, so I wouldn't be worried about being unable to be a good contributor if I were you. If this book has an example of the word being used, you can can add it as a quotation (our guidelines on that are at WT:Quotations, and if those seem too confusing, you can type it up here and I'll show you how to format it on the actual entry. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Read in another language