Welcome

edit

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Ultimateria (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Coming by to say thank you for translating all these usage examples. Keep up the good work! PUC13:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Weylaway (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, good work, I'd just like to point out that it's nonstandard to include 2 translations using a ⟨br⟩ tag. It's better to just pick one translation. If you really need to add more content, there's also the |footer= parameter. Jberkel 23:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I'll avoid doing that. Weylaway (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks (2)

edit

Thanks for catching those few sloppy copy-and-paste errors I made while I was rushing to work through my to-do list of articles to create :) . · • SUM1 • · (talk) 05:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Buck Rogers time

edit

Greetings Weylaway,

Should we classify this entry as a noun or a proper noun? newfiles (talk) 22:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'd say a noun - "Buck Rogers" is a proper noun, but it's a premodifier inside a larger noun phrase. And "Buck Rogers time" doesn't refer to one specific entity. Weylaway (talk) 22:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good, thank you. newfiles (talk) 22:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

start time and starting time

edit

Greetings Weylaway,

Would you consider these two terms to be SoP? Cambridge dic. has an entry for "starting time".

Thank you. newfiles (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm not an expert on the CFI but in my opinion they are both probably SOP and I wouldn't create them myself. However there is apparently a "lemming test" where a term can be included if it is in another dictionary despite being SOP. I guess ultimately it's for RFD to decide, if they are taken there. Weylaway (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you kindly. newfiles (talk) 23:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

magic moment

edit

How do you feel about this term? Too SoPish? Should I create it? There's a citations page that was created in 2022: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Citations:magic_moment newfiles (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

In the tech/marketing jargon sense that the quotes suggest I'd say it probably isn't SOP. Weylaway (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. newfiles (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply